Wednesday, June 02, 2010

WORLDmag.com | Community | Blog Archive | The temptation to dictatorship

WORLDmag.com | Community | Blog Archive | The temptation to dictatorship

“Love is patient.” We know the truth of this when examining ourselves personally. But does it apply to politics? We see how it does when prominent public figures go beyond expressing impatience with the democratic process to openly advocating the suspension of the Constitution so that President Obama can really get down to the business of hope and change unencumbered by the rule of law.

Woody Allen was recently quoted as saying, “It would be good . . . if he could be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly.” Granted, we’re accustomed to Hollywood personalities making bizarre political statements, and so we don’t take them as speaking for the political left in general.

But when three-time Pulitzer Prize-winner and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman says the same thing, and when NBC’s David Gregory and veteran journalist Andrea Mitchell agree with him, as they did recently on Meet the Press, it is time to oil up the Second Amendment to make sure it’s in good working condition. Only Paul Gigot interjects to point out that what everyone at the table is blithely considering is insane.

Friday, April 23, 2010

A Contrite Heart


21. April 2010 by Helps.


What’s This Lesson About?


Movies and television shows often follow a standard outline with stereotypical characters and familiar plots. From the beginning we recognize the hero and the villain. We watch as the tension builds, knowing a showdown is coming. We know who is going to prevail even if we can’t see how. We nod as the events play out to their conventional conclusion.


In this week’s lesson, the people gathered for a meal at a Pharisee’s house become the audience in a divinely directed drama. The characters are easily identifiable, and the audience fully expects events to follow a predictable pattern. But they are in for a surprise as roles are suddenly reversed, and their perspective is turned upside down. To see the story unfold, see this Sunday’s (April 25, 2010) lesson in detail at http://sermons.churchonthenet.com

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

Future Hope

There is surely a future hope for you, and your hope will not be cut off. Proverbs 23:18

Warnings abound.  The economy is in for another great crash.  Pandemics are headed our way.  Planet Earth is on the brink of destruction.  For some these serve as wake up calls.  Warnings to mend our ways or suffer dire consequences.  Even those in religious circles chime in with foreboding coming doom.  While God foretells of a future day of wrath and judgment, far more often His Words are for peace, health and security.  It is in the nature of the carnal being to be drawn aside to fables, rumors and tales of doom.  You hear the call of the Siren and are drawn to it. 
It's time to follow the instructions of the Apostle Paul.  "Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ." (2 Corinthians 10:5)  Escape fear.  Flee from doomsayers.  "Return to your fortress, O prisoners of hope; even now I announce that I will restore twice as much to you." (Zechariah 9:12)
[For a new verse of hope every weekday, follow me on Twitter]

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Transcript of President Obama’s Turkey Address

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
________________________________________________________________________________
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 6, 2009
JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA
AND PRESIDENT GUL OF TURKEY
Cankaya Palace
Ankara, Turkey
1:55 P.M. (Local)

PRESIDENT GUL: (As translated.) We are very pleased to host the President of the United States, Mr. Barack Obama, in Turkey. It would not be wrong to say that our discussions began in Strasbourg, and the discussions that we began in Strasbourg, we continued with them today, both during our meeting and then over lunch. And it was very beneficial.

At the outset of my remarks, I would like to say that we heard that there's been an earthquake in Italy -- we just heard. And I would like to express my condolences to the people who lost their lives. We share the sorrow of the Italian people.

We are very appreciative of the fact that Mr. Obama, having been elected President, made Turkey one of his stops in his first overseas visit, and we have been very happy with that -- the Turkish people have been very happy with that.

We have had opportunity to review the strategic dimension of our relations. Most of our relations seem to be on a military and political dimension, but we are also determined to move forward on the economic dimension of our relations. On the area of technology, we'll continue to support development of economic and technology cooperation. These are areas which we place importance on.

In we look at Turkish-American issues, we see that the United States is very much interested, and must be interested, in important issues around the world as a superpower, and Turkey is an important country in her region, and Turkey is very much interested in many subjects. So if we were to make two separate lists of the issues that our countries are interested in, we would see that they are very much alike. And so I'm very pleased to say that Turkey and the United States have great understanding for each other and they work in cooperation with each other.

Of course, fighting against terrorism is one of the most important issues for both of the countries, and the cooperation that we've had so far will be further developed, and in many geographies, from Afghanistan to the Caucuses to the Balkans to the Middle East, we are working together and we are determined to continue to work together. And the President has also shown great interest to Turkey's relations with the European Union. We appreciate that very much. We thank him very much for his words in that regard.

I think that this visit has been very beneficial. I'd like to welcome the President once again and wish him success.

Please.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, thank you very much. And, President Gul, you could not be a better host, and we are grateful to you and your team, as well as all the people of Turkey for the extraordinary hospitality that you've extended to us.

As you mentioned, we just heard the news of the earthquake in Italy, and we want to send out condolences to the families there and hope that we are able to get rescue teams in and that we can minimize the damage as much as possible moving forward.

I have now spent a week traveling through Europe. And I've been asked,are you trying to make a statement by ending this weeklong trip in Turkey? And the answer is, yes, I am trying to make a statement. I'm trying to make a statement about the importance of Turkey not just to the United States but to the world. This is a country that has been often said lies at the crossroads between East and West. It's a country that possesses an extraordinarily rich heritage, but also represents a blend of those ancient traditions with a modern nation state that respects democracy, respects rule of law and is striving towards a modern economy.

It is a member of NATO and it is also a majority Muslim nation, unique in that position, and so, as a consequence, has insights into a whole host of regional and strategic challenges that we may face. And I've been extraordinarily impressed with President Gul and the quality of his leadership, as well as Prime Minister Erdogan, and so, as a consequence, I'm excited about the prospects of us working together.

As the President noted, we had a wide-ranging conversation. We thanked Turkey for its outstanding work in Afghanistan, and we discussed our strategic review. We have a similar perspective in terms of how to move forward, and Turkey's contributions to ISAF and the overarching effort is going to be critical.

We discussed the progress that's been made in Iraq and how we can continue to build on that progress as the U.S. begins to draw down its troops.

We talked about Middle East peace and how that can be achieved. And we discussed the need -- a shared view for us to reduce the threat of nuclear proliferation not just in the region, but around the world. And as President Gul noted, we also talked about business and commerce, because all too often the U.S.-Turkish relationship has been characterized just by military issues and yet there's enormous possibilities for us to grow the economy and to make sure that trade between our countries and commerce and the lines of communication between our two countries continually strengthen, because we think that that's going to be good for Turkey, but it's also going to be good for the United States.

So we also discussed the issue of terrorism more broadly. And I reiterated my support to make sure that we are supporting Turkey in dealing with terrorist threats that may -- they may experience.

So, overall it was an extremely productive meeting, and it gives me confidence that, moving forward, not only are we going to be able to improve our bilateral relations, but as we work together we're going to be able to I think shape a set of strategies that can bridge the divide between the Muslim world and the West that can make us more prosperous and more secure.

And so I'm proud that the United States is a partner with Turkey, and we want to build on that partnership in the years to come.

PRESIDENT GUL: Thank you.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Okay. We were going to call on one --

PRESIDENT GUL: One and one, yes. Sorry.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Do you want me to start, or you?

PRESIDENT GUL: You can start, yes.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Christy Parsons, Chicago Tribune -- hometown -- hometown newspaper.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. As a U.S. senator you stood with the Armenian-American community in calling for Turkey's acknowledgement of the Armenian genocide and you also supported the passage of the Armenian genocide resolution. You said, as President you would recognize the genocide. And my question for you is, have you changed your view, and did you ask President Gul to recognize the genocide by name?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, my views are on the record and I have not changed views. What I have been very encouraged by is news that under President Gul's leadership, you are seeing a series of negotiations, a process, in place between Armenia and Turkey to resolve a whole host of longstanding issues, including this one.

I want to be as encouraging as possible around those negotiations which are moving forward and could bear fruit very quickly very soon. And so as a consequence, what I want to do is not focus on my views right now but focus on the views of the Turkish and the Armenian people. If they can move forward and deal with a difficult and tragic history, then I think the entire world should encourage them.

And so what I told the President was I want to be as constructive as possible in moving these issues forward quickly. And my sense is, is that they are moving quickly. I don't want to, as the President of the United States, preempt any possible arrangements or announcements that might be made in the near future. I just want to say that we are going to be a partner in working through these issues in such a way that the most important parties, the Turks and the Armenians, are finally coming to terms in a constructive way.

Q So if I understand you correctly, your view hasn't changed, but you'll put in abeyance the issue of whether to use that word in the future?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: What I'd like to do is to encourage President Gul to move forward with what have been some very fruitful negotiations. And I'm not interested in the United States in any way tilting these negotiations one way or another while they are having useful discussions.

Q Thank you.

PRESIDENT GUL: (As translated.) Let me also share my views on this subject. This is an issue under great discussion. But it is not a legal or political issue, it's a historical issue. What is being discussed is a situation that was experienced in 1915 under the conditions of World War I, when the Ottoman Empire was battling on four fronts. And unfortunately, some citizens of the empire then were provoked by some other countries and there were many internal clashes and many people lost their lives. And we share the sorrow of all those who lost their lives, but we have to remember that the Muslim population also suffered greatly at the same time.

And at the time from the Balkans, from the Caucasus, there were millions of Muslim Turks who were displaced, who were having to come to travel to Turkey, and there were many losses as they traveled. So the losses there took place during the chaotic times of the situation then.

But when the Turkish republic -- the modern republic was established, the Turkish republic did not create this into big issue in order not to create greater hatred or hostility in future generations. But unfortunately, these issues politically, especially by the diaspora, have been brought to the agenda as a way to perhaps cling to their identity.

And our view to that has been that we should let the historians, the experts on the subject, sit down and talk about this issue. We are ready to face the realities, the facts. It cannot be the politicians and the legal experts who can make decisions here as to what happened when, under what conditions, and who lost more lives, and who is right and who is wrong. It is not a parliamentarian, a politician, who can make a decision on this without knowing the circumstances to the situation.

So that's why we suggested that a joint history commission be established and that we would agree to the results or the conclusions of this commission. And Turkey opened -- made its archives available for that purpose.

And we invited everyone, including the Armenians, and we took one more step forward and we said that if another country, for example, the United States or France, if they are very much interested in this issue, then they, too, could be a part of this joint commission and we would be ready to listen to the conclusions of that commission.

We, as Turkey, we would like to have good relations with all the countries in our region. Our relations with Armenia, unfortunately, did not exist so much, although there are some Armenian citizens in Turkey now -- there are more than 70,000 Armenians who work -- live in Turkey, who send money back to their families and there are some cultural activities. But we didn't have other relations. And our goal in order to normalize these relations, as Mr. President has just said, we initiated some discussions to normalize relations and we would like to see a good resolution of these discussions.

No doubt there's a new situation in the Caucasus. We saw how potential events could flare up in the Caucuses last year. So it's important that in this process we work together to try to resolve the issues in the Caucasus. We should work to resolve issues between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and all the conflict in the region so that the area becomes fertile ground for greater cooperation.

And we have a lot of work, with the best of intentions, in that regard, and I do believe that when we reach a conclusion we will have resolved many issues.

Q A question to both Presidents, both leaders. Mr. Obama, during the Bush presidency there were some difficulties in Turkish-American relations, and certain steps were taken to resolve those difficulties. We are in the third month of your presidency and there is a high expectation in the Turkish public opinion, as well, about Turkish-American relations. So what will be changes in your outlook on Turkish-American relations as opposed to the previous administration?

Another question to both Presidents. You said that you discussed fighting against terrorism. There's, again, a lot of expectation in the Turkish public opinion regarding the elimination of the PKK. What sort of concrete steps will we see in that regard?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: As I mentioned at the outset, I think despite some of the problems that we saw, beginning in 2003, that you have seen steady improvement between U.S.-Turkish relations. I don't think they ever deteriorated so far that we ceased to be friends and allies. And what I hope to do is to build on what is already a strong foundation. As I indicated earlier, commercial ties can be improved. That's an area where I think the President and I share a vision.

I think when it comes to our cooperation on terrorism, I've been very clear that PKK is on our terrorist watch list. As a NATO ally of Turkey's, we are very comfortable with providing them the assistance they need to reduce the threat. We have seen that cooperation bear fruit over the last several months, over the last year. You've seen a lessening of the attacks that have been taking place. We'll continue to provide that support, and President Gul and I discussed how we can provide additional support on that front. But we have been very clear that terrorism is not acceptable in any circumstances.

I think that where -- where there's the most promise of building stronger U.S.-Turkish relations is in the recognition that Turkey and the United States can build a model partnership in which a predominantly Christian nation and a predominantly Muslim nation, a Western nation and a nation that straddles two continents -- that we can create a modern international community that is respectful, that is secure, that is prosperous; that there are not tensions, inevitable tensions, between cultures, which I think is extraordinarily important.

That's something that's very important to me. And I've said before that one of the great strengths of the United States is -- although as I mentioned, we have a very large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation; we consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.

I think Turkey was -- modern Turkey was founded with a similar set of principles, and yet what we're seeing is in both countries that promise of a secular country that is respectful of religious freedom, respectful of rule of law, respectful of freedom, upholding these values and being willing to stand up for them in the international stage. If we are joined together in delivering that message, East and West, to -- to the world, then I think that we can have an extraordinary impact. And I'm very much looking forward to that partnership in the days to come.

Okay.

PRESIDENT GUL: Okay. Thank you.

END 2:16 P.M. (Local)

Monday, March 30, 2009

Socialism In America

The Obama administration used the threat of withholding more bailout money to force out General Motors Corp. Chief Executive Rick Wagoner and administer harsh medicine to Chrysler LLC, marking one of the most dramatic government interventions in private industry since the economic crisis began last year.

[GM CEO Rick Wagoner] Associated Press

DETROIT IN CRISIS: The ouster of Rick Wagoner, shown at a February news conference, is a milestone in the state's intervention in the economy.

The administration's auto team announced the departure of Mr. Wagoner on Sunday. In a summary of its findings, the task force added that it doesn't believe Chrysler is viable as a stand-alone company, and suggested that the best chance for success for both GM and Chrysler "may well require utilizing the bankruptcy code in a quick and surgical way."

The move also indicates that the Treasury Department intends to wade more deeply than most observers expected into the affairs of the country's largest and oldest car company. 
from the Wall Street Journal

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Swift, steep downturn crosses globe - Washington Post

NEW YORK - Markets around the world plunged Tuesday as evidence mounted that the global economic crisis is worsening.

Japan is suffering its worst downturn in 35 years. The British economy is facing its sharpest decline in almost 30 years. Germany is slumping at its worst pace in nearly 20 years. Meanwhile, the job market in the United States, at the epicenter of the global downturn, is the worst in decades. And emerging economies are contracting at a pace few had predicted just months ago. Even China, whose economy still is growing at a 6.8 percent annual pace, is grappling with vast numbers of the unemployed, raising fears of unrest.

The sharpness of the global slowdown has alarmed economists, who see no obvious engine for recovery.

Swift, steep downturn crosses globe - Washington Post- msnbc.com

Friday, February 13, 2009

Washington Times - CBO: Obama stimulus harmful over long haul

Washington Times - CBO: Obama stimulus harmful over long haul 

President Obama's economic recovery package will actually hurt the economy more in the long run than if he were to do nothing, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.

CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.

CBO estimates that by 2019 the Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on net. [The House bill] would have similar long-run effects, CBO said in a letter to Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, who was tapped by Mr. Obama on Tuesday to be Commerce Secretary.

The House last week passed a bill totaling about $820 billion while the Senate is working on a proposal reaching about $900 billion in spending increases and tax cuts.

But Republicans and some moderate Democrats have balked at the size of the bill and at some of the spending items included in it, arguing they won't produce immediate jobs, which is the stated goal of the bill.

The budget office had previously estimated service the debt due to the new spending could add hundreds of millions of dollars to the cost of the bill -- forcing the crowd-out.

CBOs basic assumption is that, in the long run, each dollar of additional debt crowds out about a third of a dollars worth of private domestic capital, CBO said in its letter.

CBO said there is no crowding out in the short term, so the plan would succeed in boosting growth in 2009 and 2010.

The agency projected the Senate bill would produce between 1.4 percent and 4.1 percent higher growth in 2009 than if there was no action. For 2010, the plan would boost growth by 1.2 percent to 3.6 percent.

CBO did project the bill would create jobs, though by 2011 the effects would be minuscule.

Washington Times - CBO: Obama stimulus harmful over long haul

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Bacon Hunt: Stimulus Bill Contains Many Items That May Not Boost Economy - First 100 Days of Presidency - Politics FOXNews.com

Democratic leaders are hailing the economic stimulus bill as a way to "invest quickly into the economy," but according to a Wall Street Journal estimate, only about 12 cents of every dollar will actually go to "something that can plausibly be considered a growth stimulus."

President Obama has defined stimulus as money that would go into creating jobs and moving the economy in the next two years.

"From the beginning, this recovery plan has had at its core a simple idea: Let's put Americans to work doing the work America needs done. It will save or create more than 3 million jobs over the next two years, all across the country," he said during his radio and Internet address last Saturday.

The following measures in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act have not been included in this list based on any scale of worthiness but merely on whether they fit the definition given by the president of helping stimulate the economy in the next two years. The provisions were identified by FOX News readers prior to the final conference agreement, which is scheduled for votes in the House and Senate in the next two days

Tucked in among the vast construction projects and tax relief programs is an effort to revive a law that's been dead for over 60 years that would provide up to $198 million in pensions for Filipinos who fought alongside the U.S. during WWII. U.S. citizens would get $15,000 a year, but even non-citizens would still get $9,000 a year.

The bill also invests heavily in research and technology. NASA is set to receive $450 million for "Science" and another $200 million for "Aeronautics."

More than $28 billion is being provided to put kids in special education, Head Start and child care and development programs for disadvantaged children.

FOXNews.com readers pored over the package and found a host of expenditures that might not pump money in any time soon. What follows is a list of some of the more fascinating -- if less stimulating -- items in the bill:

-- $100 million for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program
-- $200 million to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Program
-- $300 million for "Violence Against Women Prevention and Prosecution Programs"
-- $900 million for the IRS for the "Limitation on Administrative Expenses"
-- $1 million for the Railroad Retirement Board for administrative costs
-- $2 billion for the Drinking Water State Revolving Act
-- $50 million for Health and Human Services to carry out injury prevention programs
-- $1.1 billion for studies on the effectiveness of different medical treatments -- $200 million to upgrade labs and facilities for the Department of Agriculture "to improve workplace safety and mission-area efficiencies"
-- $10 million for urban canal inspection
-- $16 billion to pay for student financial aid
-- $1 billion to pay for the U.S. Census
-- $600 million to pay for a fuel-efficient federal auto fleet
-- $650 million for the Digital Converter Box Program to help the constantly delayed transition from analog television
-- $485 million to the Forest Service for "hazardous fuels reduction and hazard mitigation activities in areas at high risk of catastrophic wildfire"
-- Up to $1 billion for "summer activities" for youths as old as 24
-- $40 million for the occupational research agenda
-- $3 billion for the Centers for Disease Control wellness programs and vaccinations
-- $410 million for Indian health facilities
-- $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstrations

Friday, February 06, 2009

Bought With A Price


Romans 1:1
Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God

I’ve been teaching Romans for some time but this part won’t leave me alone. It comes down to three words. Faith (pistis), Believe (pisteuo) and Faithful (pistos). Three forms of one word, the noun, the verb and the adjective. What do these have to do with selling out to God? That’s a phrase you don’t hear much these days, but it makes all the difference. In the course of this study we will see the recurring theme of Christianity; we are saved by grace through faith (Eph.2:8). When you first become a Christian it probably goes something like this. After your spirit experiences conviction for sins committed in the body, sorrow ensues and repentance follows. Not to burst any bubbles, but if that’s where it stopped we have a big problem.

What seems to have been lost over time is servitude. We think it’s optional. After all, we’re not under the Law anymore so it’s ok if we live indifferent lives, as long as we at least try to be good people.

Time to wake up!

You begin with faith, a free gift, apply faith (believe), but next comes living it (faithfulness). 1 Corinthians 6:20 says “For you are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s”. The first step then is that to become a Christian you must understand that you are selling your body and spirit to God for the redemption of your soul. As a result you are to glorify God in both body and spirit. In Romans 7:4 we’ll study that Paul taught “you become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that you should be married to another, even to Him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.” To the Colossians (1:10) Paul wrote, “That you might walk worthy of the Lord, pleasing Him in all you do, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God”.

Sounds more like works and less like faith? Remember, the initial work of cleansing us from our sins is indeed totally paid for by Jesus Christ. We only have to believe His sacrifice cleanses us.

But what about faith? Faith comes by hearing (understanding) the WordRomans 10:27. Faith without works (corresponding actions) is deadJames 2:20. Picture this. It’s a cold, dark snowy winter. Outside the temperature is 10 degrees and falling. Your electric goes out. Just in time the National Guard shows up with a free generator and fuel. They set you up, get your heat going and you’re warm and happy. Until the gas runs out. You begin to grow cold. The generator and fuel are free, why aren’t you warm? At some point (soon) you’re going to have to participate in your salvation and add fuel to the generator. The bottom line is that if you think you can maintain your faith by being a nice person most of the time and enduring a few church services, you may be losing faith.

You may say, “Of course I believe!” but I remind you that mental agreement with something is not the same as believing. Believing (a verb) provokes action. Psalm 5:9 says “It is not faithfulness in their mouth, but flattery;…” Proverbs 20:6 echoes, “Most men will proclaim every one his own goodness; but a faithful man who can find?” What Paul told the Colossians in chapter 1 was, “9For this cause we also, since the day we heard of it (your love in the Spirit), do not cease to pray for you, and to desire that you might be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding; 10that you might walk worthy of the Lord…” So it still isn’t a matter of works but of faith. Works then becomes the barometer by which we can measure the health of our faith. Not legalistic religious activity. You can fake works until you burn out. Paul said here that as you are filled with the knowledge of God’s will, in both wisdom and spiritual understanding, you will walk worthy of the Lord. Jesus said we will recognize wolves in sheep’s clothing by watching their fruitMatt. 7:16, showing that saying you are a believer does not make you a believer.

Jesus said to the church at Ephesus in Revelation 2: “Nevertheless I have somewhat against you, because you have left your first love.” The Greek word for left is aphiemi which means to disregard; to allow to expire. That first fire of faith can expire just like any fire that is not fueled. How do we fuel our faith? Jesus continues in 2:5 “Remember therefore from where you are fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come to you quickly (suddenly), and will remove your candlestick out if his place, unless you repent”. When He says in verse 7 that He’ll give the fruit of the tree of life to him who overcomes, He’s telling us in His positive, loving way that if we fail in this we will not partake of eternal life.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Downloads | Ernie's Web Log

lxx_text Ernie has made available for a very small donation what he describes as the common man’s perspective on the Septuagint or LLX.  The earliest version of the Old Testament Scriptures which is extant, or of which we possess any certain knowledge, is the translation executed at Alexandria in the third century before the Christian era.  The earliest writer who gives an account of the Septuagint version is Aristobulus, a Jew who lived at the commencement of the second century B.C. He says that the version of the Law into Greek was completed under the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus, and that Demetrius Phalereus had been employed about it. Now, Demetrius died about the beginning of the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus, and hence it has been reasonably inferred that Aristobulus is a witness that the work of translation had been commenced under Ptolemy Soter.
Regardless of your personal perspective, these writings are valuable research tools for any true student of the Bible.

Downloads | Ernie's Web Log | Online Version